SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
73
73
Jan 19, 2013
01/13
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 73
favorite 0
quote 0
commissioner antonini. >> commissioner antonini: thank you for what you're doing. it looks interesting. it's hard to visualize what the whole thing looks like because we heard about the different parts and maybe there is an overview of everything. but i had a few questions. looks like you have some kind of fence or screen, if i'm looking at the right thing, in the middle of the plaza somewhere. it looks like it's clear, some sort of clear material. >> sir, i don't understand the question. >> commissioner antonini: well i guess it's hard to really see which one it is. i'm not sure -- >> okay, that. yeah. there's nothing in -- >> commissioner antonini: that's something that is used somewhere else. is that right? >> no. >> commissioner antonini: it's a little hard to tell what's planned and what is somewhere else. >> oh, you know that's the edge of the building. are you talking about the plastic? >> commissioner antonini: yeah. >> that's the edge of the building. >> commissioner antonini: you just did symbolic. >> symbolic. sorry. you get so into it -- >> commissioner
commissioner antonini. >> commissioner antonini: thank you for what you're doing. it looks interesting. it's hard to visualize what the whole thing looks like because we heard about the different parts and maybe there is an overview of everything. but i had a few questions. looks like you have some kind of fence or screen, if i'm looking at the right thing, in the middle of the plaza somewhere. it looks like it's clear, some sort of clear material. >> sir, i don't understand the...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
74
74
Jan 18, 2013
01/13
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 74
favorite 0
quote 0
antonini: thank you. i introduced to the commission last week, some -- a plan by captain tang lin,, and it's a matter of public record. i don't know how much of the public has had a chance to look at it. it shows a lot of promise. on my 11 years on the planning commission it's been very gratifying that we have passed a lot of measures that have provided a lot of housing and provided a lot of commercial space and a lot of other good things but the problems with a lot of individuals who are in need still remains. and all you have to do is go outside and walk on any ar partf the city and see people who are obviously not capable of taking care of themselves. and, you know, we have not been able to deal with this problem. so i think anybody who has a plan that shows merit, and apparently it has worked in other cities and has worked for a while while it was in place here, we do pass a lot of supportive housing, but if it we can't get individuals into support iverg housing, the housing does not solve the problem
antonini: thank you. i introduced to the commission last week, some -- a plan by captain tang lin,, and it's a matter of public record. i don't know how much of the public has had a chance to look at it. it shows a lot of promise. on my 11 years on the planning commission it's been very gratifying that we have passed a lot of measures that have provided a lot of housing and provided a lot of commercial space and a lot of other good things but the problems with a lot of individuals who are in...
SFGTV2: San Francisco Government Television
73
73
Jan 10, 2013
01/13
by
SFGTV2
tv
eye 73
favorite 0
quote 0
commissioner antonini? >> move to approve. >> second. >> on that motion, commissioner antonini? >> aye. >> commissioner hillis? >> aye. >> commissioner moore? >> aye. >> commissioner sugaya? >> no. >> commissioner wu? >> aye. >> and commission president fong? >> aye. >> so moved, commissioners, that motion passes 5 to 1 with commissioner sugaya voting against. that will place you under commissioners questions and matters. item 2, consideration of adoption draft minutes of regular meeting for december 6 and december 13th, 2012. >> any public comment on minutes? is there a motion to approve? >> so moved. >> second. >> on the motion to adopt regular hearing minutes for december 6th and 13th, commissioner antonini? >> aye. >> commissioner hillis? >> aye. >> commissioner moore? >> aye. >> commissioner sugaya? >> aye. >> commissioner wu? and commission president fong? >> aye. >> so moved, commissionersv. that motion passes unanimously 6 to 0. and places you on item 3, commission comments and questions. >> commissioner antonini. >> well, we're all very encouraged, i think, by things we
commissioner antonini? >> move to approve. >> second. >> on that motion, commissioner antonini? >> aye. >> commissioner hillis? >> aye. >> commissioner moore? >> aye. >> commissioner sugaya? >> no. >> commissioner wu? >> aye. >> and commission president fong? >> aye. >> so moved, commissioners, that motion passes 5 to 1 with commissioner sugaya voting against. that will place you under commissioners...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
78
78
Jan 19, 2013
01/13
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 78
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> commissioner antonini: but we would presumably be the decision-making body on that if it's planning code. >> the board of supervisors is the city's legislative body so you as the primary land use body you get to make a recommendation to themn is non-binding, and the final vote will be at the board of supervisors whether to change that law or not. >> commissioner antonini: i just remember previous instances of us discussing these policies such as mergers and demolitions. revised them over the last few years, and i've never heard of any appeals or any action by the board of supervisors on our policies in the past. i guess it doesn't mean they can't do it, but its kind of a change. >> we'll get that history and i'm sure supervisor avalos would like to explain the impetus of the legislation at the hearing. >> commissioner antonini: thank you. >> thank you. >> good afternoon, commissioners, tim frye, department staff, here to share with you the results of yesterday's historic preservation commission hearing. there are two items that were on their calendar, that i think are noteworthy to
. >> commissioner antonini: but we would presumably be the decision-making body on that if it's planning code. >> the board of supervisors is the city's legislative body so you as the primary land use body you get to make a recommendation to themn is non-binding, and the final vote will be at the board of supervisors whether to change that law or not. >> commissioner antonini: i just remember previous instances of us discussing these policies such as mergers and demolitions....
SFGTV2: San Francisco Government Television
66
66
Jan 17, 2013
01/13
by
SFGTV2
tv
eye 66
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> president fong: commissioner antonini. >> commissioner antonini: thank you. a couple of things i was interested in learning the twin peaks tavern allegedly the first of the bars with windows where you could look in. the first of the so-called fern bars because i thought ith&::úss henry -- it would be the late 60's early 70's. but on another note, i heard about the avalos legislation. and, now, i remember we've, on numerous occasions considered our policy on demolitions and reset the policy accordingly. so i don't understand why -- i guess its strfl administrative i don't know why the board of supervisors -- >> the clerk of the board has not transmitted the full ordinance to us yet but we will, in our analysis, review, as you said, we've done recent updates to our merger criteria and will review that history when we bring the ordinance before you. >> commissioner antonini: but we would presumably be the decision-making body on that if it's planning code. >> the board of supervisors is the city's legislative body so you as the primary land use body you get to
. >> president fong: commissioner antonini. >> commissioner antonini: thank you. a couple of things i was interested in learning the twin peaks tavern allegedly the first of the bars with windows where you could look in. the first of the so-called fern bars because i thought ith&::úss henry -- it would be the late 60's early 70's. but on another note, i heard about the avalos legislation. and, now, i remember we've, on numerous occasions considered our policy on demolitions and...
SFGTV2: San Francisco Government Television
112
112
Jan 17, 2013
01/13
by
SFGTV2
tv
eye 112
favorite 0
quote 0
commissioner antonini. >> commissioner antonini: i'd like to ask about a, b, and c. do we have availability two weeks the 31st of january? >> january 31 is an extremely light calendar, or agenda for now, because it was added to the schedule so late. >> commissioner antonini: that might be a good time to propose a continuance, if that -- >> it would be. >> commissioner antonini: so i will therefore move to continue items no. 1 and 2 to the date specified, and items 16a, b and c to january 31. >> second. >> on that motion to continue items 1 and 2 and item 16a, b and c to january 31, commissioner antonini, aye. >> bore don, aye. >> hill list, aye. >> moore, aye. >> sugaya, aye. >> wu, aye. >> president fong, aye. under commissioners questions and matters, item 3, election of officers, according with the rules and regulation his the president and vice president shall be elected at the first regular meeting of the commission held on or after the 15th day of january of each year or to a subsequent meeting. the date, which shall be fixed by the commission at the first regu
commissioner antonini. >> commissioner antonini: i'd like to ask about a, b, and c. do we have availability two weeks the 31st of january? >> january 31 is an extremely light calendar, or agenda for now, because it was added to the schedule so late. >> commissioner antonini: that might be a good time to propose a continuance, if that -- >> it would be. >> commissioner antonini: so i will therefore move to continue items no. 1 and 2 to the date specified, and items...
SFGTV2: San Francisco Government Television
53
53
Jan 31, 2013
01/13
by
SFGTV2
tv
eye 53
favorite 0
quote 0
1 and 2, commissioner antonini? >> aye. >> commissioner sugaya? >> aye. >> commissioner president fong. >> that motion passes unanimously 7-0. and places you under commissioners' questions and matters, adoption of commission minutes, i have no speaker cards. >> any fub lick comment on the draft of the minutes? seeing none, motion to approve. >> move to approve. >> second. >> commissioner moore is, next item. >> on that motion to adopt minutes for january 17, 2013, commissioner antonini. >> aye. >> commissioner borden? >> aye. >> commissioner moore? >> aye. >> commissioner wu. >> and commission president fong? >> that motion passes unanimously 7-0. >> item 4, commission comments/questions. >> commissioner moore? >> i wanted to comment on the ribbon common on the veterans, it was a remarkable event not because of who was in attendance but because of the incredible number of people who supported and helped make this project possible, it was a lovely adapted reuse, it was a historical element, a strong second tax advant
1 and 2, commissioner antonini? >> aye. >> commissioner sugaya? >> aye. >> commissioner president fong. >> that motion passes unanimously 7-0. and places you under commissioners' questions and matters, adoption of commission minutes, i have no speaker cards. >> any fub lick comment on the draft of the minutes? seeing none, motion to approve. >> move to approve. >> second. >> commissioner moore is, next item. >> on that motion to adopt...
SFGTV2: San Francisco Government Television
80
80
Jan 3, 2013
01/13
by
SFGTV2
tv
eye 80
favorite 0
quote 0
>> that is correct, commissioner antonini. >> commissioner antonini: this view is a little bit oblique. the other question i have is that there is a little bit of an elevation on this, and sometimes if the garage door isn't wide enough, it's difficult when you try to get your car in there. i don't know. i may ask the project sponsor's attorney a question in just a the setback issue that would be on the second floor, is that correct, mr. wang, where we want the setback on the second floor. >> it is on the top floor, the third floor. >> commissioner antonini: third, rather. second floor above the garage, garage being the first floor which does go down the hill quite a ways too. okay. i don't really see that as much of an impact as i do the rear setback you're advocating for because it seems to me that even in its present position, the third floor setback does not have too much of an impact on the adjacent property but the rear of the building might have more of an impact. so i would be more interested in -- maybe i could ask project sponsor's attorney about the suggestions in the rear. t
>> that is correct, commissioner antonini. >> commissioner antonini: this view is a little bit oblique. the other question i have is that there is a little bit of an elevation on this, and sometimes if the garage door isn't wide enough, it's difficult when you try to get your car in there. i don't know. i may ask the project sponsor's attorney a question in just a the setback issue that would be on the second floor, is that correct, mr. wang, where we want the setback on the second...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
68
68
Jan 18, 2013
01/13
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 68
favorite 0
quote 0
antonini: i think it's actually very well done in general. i would agree with those who would say maybe instead of calling it a charter, we call it a credo just because of the confusion that exists because we are a charter. it's not a part of the charter of the city so that might be a -- or use another word similar to that. the other thing i found a little bit confusing is at the very beginning we talk about the world's most livable urban place and i guess by livability we imply ability to work in it, ability to enjoy it recreationally because we're not merely just addressing the environment for those who may liv5p$i(om here, but also for te who are here for a lot of other purposes too. as general as we can make it. and then under bullet points, which is our mission, i don't see anything mentioned -- i talk about fostering exemplary design, that's something new. but i see nothing mentioned about preserving our historic resources which is very important, and should be a bullet point because we have one of the new cities at least in america tha
antonini: i think it's actually very well done in general. i would agree with those who would say maybe instead of calling it a charter, we call it a credo just because of the confusion that exists because we are a charter. it's not a part of the charter of the city so that might be a -- or use another word similar to that. the other thing i found a little bit confusing is at the very beginning we talk about the world's most livable urban place and i guess by livability we imply ability to work...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
65
65
Jan 5, 2013
01/13
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 65
favorite 0
quote 0
seeing none, commissioner antonini. >> commissioner antonini: move to approve. >> second. >> the clerk: on that motion, commissioner antonini, aye, commissioner borden, aye, hillis, wu, aye, fong, aye. so moved that passes unanimously. commissioners, we are going to call items 9(a) and b out of order. at 4 i 22 vincente street. >> ask the commission to recuse myself as we prepared materials for the project sponsor. >> move to recuse commissioner sugaya. >> second. >> on the motion to recuse, commissioner antonini, aye, commissioner borden, aye, commissioner wu, aye, commissioner fong, aye. so moved. >> good afternoon, president fong, members of the planning commission, staff tom wang, discretionary review case. this is discretionary review involving demolition in a new building. the proposal is to demolish an existing two story vacant single family dwelling with a non-functional garage and replace it with a new single family dwelling, two story over garage. the report provided by the project sponsor, the department believes the -- demonstrated the existing structure is unsound. and the
seeing none, commissioner antonini. >> commissioner antonini: move to approve. >> second. >> the clerk: on that motion, commissioner antonini, aye, commissioner borden, aye, hillis, wu, aye, fong, aye. so moved that passes unanimously. commissioners, we are going to call items 9(a) and b out of order. at 4 i 22 vincente street. >> ask the commission to recuse myself as we prepared materials for the project sponsor. >> move to recuse commissioner sugaya. >>...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
48
48
Jan 18, 2013
01/13
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 48
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> president fong: commissioner antonini. >> commissioner antonini: one thing i didn't understand completely, during this, is there was an action that was taken by i believe it was either superior court or an appeals court in august of 2012, where they did agree with project sponsor on the issue of whether it was appealed to the board of supervisors or not. and it seems to me that this seems to be a yes or no issue. how could it be confusing, whether or not project sponsor appeal to the board of supervisors, it would be a matter of record if they did, or maybe they tried to do it and it wasn't accepted. i don't understand how that would be a gray area. >> i'm not familiar with the decision that you're referring to by the -- from the california court of appeal. i'm not aware of any -- >> commissioner antonini: that was part of your presentation today. >> deputy city attorney mar leta burn. i think i understand where the confusion is. the question in the litigation wasn't whether or not they had tried to appeal to the board of supervisors. they had not tried to appeal that decision to the boar
. >> president fong: commissioner antonini. >> commissioner antonini: one thing i didn't understand completely, during this, is there was an action that was taken by i believe it was either superior court or an appeals court in august of 2012, where they did agree with project sponsor on the issue of whether it was appealed to the board of supervisors or not. and it seems to me that this seems to be a yes or no issue. how could it be confusing, whether or not project sponsor appeal...
SFGTV2: San Francisco Government Television
66
66
Jan 17, 2013
01/13
by
SFGTV2
tv
eye 66
favorite 0
quote 0
antonini: i think it's actually very well done in general. i would agree with those who would say maybe instead
antonini: i think it's actually very well done in general. i would agree with those who would say maybe instead
SFGTV2: San Francisco Government Television
54
54
Jan 17, 2013
01/13
by
SFGTV2
tv
eye 54
favorite 0
quote 0
commissioner antonini. >> commissioner antonini: thank you for your report. i got a few questions on some things that, you know, you may have not looked at or maybe you have. the central steam plant idea, it's very popular in manhattan and we have some of it here. i think i went by one near mid-plaza and it services a small area. but what they do is they have central steamers and they supply heat and presumably maybe air conditioning, but certainly heat, through the steam system for huge parts of manhattan out of a central plant. seems to me that's a good way of doing it. >> they serve about 120 buildings, i believe downtown. it's -- it provides heating and cooling. and it's a nice system because it takes boilers and chillers out of buildings, and buildings connect to a centralized system. and this helps in the efficiency, environmentally, and therefore also economically because it's a tighter system so it needs less power. but it also frees up space within the buildings that the building owners then could rent or do other things with. and one reason why i re
commissioner antonini. >> commissioner antonini: thank you for your report. i got a few questions on some things that, you know, you may have not looked at or maybe you have. the central steam plant idea, it's very popular in manhattan and we have some of it here. i think i went by one near mid-plaza and it services a small area. but what they do is they have central steamers and they supply heat and presumably maybe air conditioning, but certainly heat, through the steam system for huge...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
39
39
Jan 12, 2013
01/13
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 39
favorite 0
quote 0
commissioner antonini. >> thank you. to answer some questions that were raised and they come up frequently, we have cell phone conditional uses before us almost on a weekly basis. in terms of even the map that the speaker just brought, the heaviest concentration as a product of usage and it's the most heavily in the middle of downtown because obviously you have the most heaviest use there with high-rise buildings where people are on number of different floors and they're all using their electronic devices almost constantly all day long, even those on the street. so, you know, it's not -- there is not a reason why you have to -- you can't possibly put antennas in a specific area. there is a limit to how far the antenna will process the signal. and then there is the demand, which has become astronomical because everyone is using these electronic devices all day long for everything. and, so, it's increasing astro no, ma'am li. -- a astronomically. the federal government has set and they're measured from any antennas. and as
commissioner antonini. >> thank you. to answer some questions that were raised and they come up frequently, we have cell phone conditional uses before us almost on a weekly basis. in terms of even the map that the speaker just brought, the heaviest concentration as a product of usage and it's the most heavily in the middle of downtown because obviously you have the most heaviest use there with high-rise buildings where people are on number of different floors and they're all using their...
SFGTV2: San Francisco Government Television
74
74
Jan 31, 2013
01/13
by
SFGTV2
tv
eye 74
favorite 0
quote 0
>> commissioner antonini? >> thank you for your comments and particular reference and i was going to make the same comment in regards to responses to public comment and as i understand it and you pointed out under ceqa, you can't take into consideration the impact that something that is conceptual has not been funded or analyzed, it's the other way around, when that particular project would come up and you would have to look at this and there's no way of knowing what impacks that would bring, it might improve traffic flow as i think has been the case with the freeway not being there, i think we had more congestion when that was being presented. the other question i have and typically the period of time between the end of the draft eir comment period and the final eir certification is much shorter than is the case here and i think i understand that because a selection was made of a particular variant and it needed -- while there weren't any changes, everything was analyzed already, but there was time to actuall
>> commissioner antonini? >> thank you for your comments and particular reference and i was going to make the same comment in regards to responses to public comment and as i understand it and you pointed out under ceqa, you can't take into consideration the impact that something that is conceptual has not been funded or analyzed, it's the other way around, when that particular project would come up and you would have to look at this and there's no way of knowing what impacks that...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
44
44
Jan 18, 2013
01/13
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 44
favorite 0
quote 0
commissioner antonini. >> commissioner antonini: thank you for your report. i got a few questions on some things that, you know, you may have not looked at or maybe you ha
commissioner antonini. >> commissioner antonini: thank you for your report. i got a few questions on some things that, you know, you may have not looked at or maybe you ha
SFGTV2: San Francisco Government Television
58
58
Jan 31, 2013
01/13
by
SFGTV2
tv
eye 58
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> commissioner antonini. >> do you want to take public comment first and then i can carry on after that, if there is any on this item? >> are you finished? >> i was going to say that in regards to what commissioner moore has said, if the commission feels more comfortable putting the action item on next week's calendar for the 7th, i mean, i'm only asking for an approval of what we're doing and what i described in general terms with the timetable, but not any action on any final selection process, and that's basically what i think we should have, some sort of consent along those lines but it doesn't have to be today. we can calendar it for next week if that's possible, it's up to the pleasure of the commission. >> okay. so, if -- unless i'm missing something sig kanlt, we sort of asked the sub-committee to go out, do performance work, and come back with a sub submit -- committee, i'm a little uncertain why we need to take an approval or take action on something that is not 100% solidified yet, it seems like it's going in that direction and maybe by the next meeting, we would have so
. >> commissioner antonini. >> do you want to take public comment first and then i can carry on after that, if there is any on this item? >> are you finished? >> i was going to say that in regards to what commissioner moore has said, if the commission feels more comfortable putting the action item on next week's calendar for the 7th, i mean, i'm only asking for an approval of what we're doing and what i described in general terms with the timetable, but not any action on...
SFGTV2: San Francisco Government Television
74
74
Jan 18, 2013
01/13
by
SFGTV2
tv
eye 74
favorite 0
quote 0
commissioner antonini. >> i had a few questions on the project. i'm just making sure i have the staff report correct. since our last hearing and this has been changed and we now have 15 parking places instead of just the 10, so and that would be some residential and some commercial. how would the distribution be? maybe the architect could answer? >> jeremy shaw, project architect. we converted the proposed two car garage in the rear to three car garage and utilizing all spaces and it's exclusively for the residential. >> okay. so you now have -- i guess you've got how many total units on this. >> 10. >> so 1.5. that's fine. that makes sense to me. the other question i have, and maybe this a question i will just ask you. these are for sale units? >> undetermined at this point. >> yeah, but i mean your condo conversion -- >> they will be condo mapped. >> i was trying to look through and read -- i should have done this in the report. are the conversions all two bedrooms? >> this is something ben and i was talking about outside. there are different si
commissioner antonini. >> i had a few questions on the project. i'm just making sure i have the staff report correct. since our last hearing and this has been changed and we now have 15 parking places instead of just the 10, so and that would be some residential and some commercial. how would the distribution be? maybe the architect could answer? >> jeremy shaw, project architect. we converted the proposed two car garage in the rear to three car garage and utilizing all spaces and...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
42
42
Jan 18, 2013
01/13
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 42
favorite 0
quote 0
seeing none, commissioner antonini. >> commissioner antonini: i just had a couple questions for mr. demartini. just some individual items that come up, and these are, you know, just part of the whole picture, but i know there are all these different options that are being analyzed for the central subway exiting, and, you know, one wit may include a sta. but i assume we have taken into consideration the budget to be able to do the planning necessary for that particular contingency, or there will be something decided upon. >> commissioner, the eir we're talking about is for the planning that we're doing in the central corridor. the subway itself, the eir was certified quite a number of years ago. so that is clear, that is under construction. we're now looking at the planning work that we're doing around it, to look at the zoning and other street improvements and other issues in that area. so that's the eir that's being talked about. >> commissioner antonini: i know we were talking about that but i was talking about changes now as we talk about where the boring of the street changes ar
seeing none, commissioner antonini. >> commissioner antonini: i just had a couple questions for mr. demartini. just some individual items that come up, and these are, you know, just part of the whole picture, but i know there are all these different options that are being analyzed for the central subway exiting, and, you know, one wit may include a sta. but i assume we have taken into consideration the budget to be able to do the planning necessary for that particular contingency, or...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
123
123
Jan 12, 2013
01/13
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 123
favorite 0
quote 0
commissioner antonini. >> thank you. well, as was pointed out by project sponsor this is kind of a small building in an area where a lot of the buildings are larger and unusual relevant to the appearance of the others but it would make it more compliant because 71% of the buildings in the area are single family and originally built as a single family and i don't see any reason why we should deny this. it makes a lot of sense. if project sponsor wanted to go up and add an additional floor and maybe change the configuration of the garage in the front and make it less of a visual garage coming in, but this is making a huge project out of something he just merely wants to combine the two units as they were originally configured, so i would suggest we do not take dr and approve the project. >> is that a motion? >> that's a motion. >> second. >> >> commissioner moore. >> i have been looking for the unit sizes, what they are now and what they would be when they're merged. the other thing i would like to ask, and that is a quest
commissioner antonini. >> thank you. well, as was pointed out by project sponsor this is kind of a small building in an area where a lot of the buildings are larger and unusual relevant to the appearance of the others but it would make it more compliant because 71% of the buildings in the area are single family and originally built as a single family and i don't see any reason why we should deny this. it makes a lot of sense. if project sponsor wanted to go up and add an additional floor...
SFGTV2: San Francisco Government Television
90
90
Jan 11, 2013
01/13
by
SFGTV2
tv
eye 90
favorite 0
quote 0
thank you. >> commissioner antonini. >> thank you. out of curiosity i don't know -- if doesn't really matter but i am wondering how long -- is it a separate parcel i am sure and probably been a separate parcel for qhiet a while. >> it is. >> and portolla had houses moved around and when they widened portolla and it's been a while so i have a couple questions i guess for mr. lynn if i could ask you something. >> yes, sir. >> what month of the year was the picture taken with the sunsetting in your -- >> in that window. september 24. >> september 24. >> almost falls on my birthday. >> okay. so kind of the middle of the year. >> i have been watching it for a long time. >> yeah, i do the same thing out the bedroom window and the sun moves across the sky in different directions in the seasons and one blocks off the sun in the extreme winder months and the rest of the year, so i am trying to figure out. this might come and go depending on the blockage of this particular house. >> i could show you the pictures again. where her house is it's g
thank you. >> commissioner antonini. >> thank you. out of curiosity i don't know -- if doesn't really matter but i am wondering how long -- is it a separate parcel i am sure and probably been a separate parcel for qhiet a while. >> it is. >> and portolla had houses moved around and when they widened portolla and it's been a while so i have a couple questions i guess for mr. lynn if i could ask you something. >> yes, sir. >> what month of the year was the...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
61
61
Jan 18, 2013
01/13
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 61
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> commissioner antonini: that sounds great and hopefully we can persuade some of the existing buildings in parts of doubt to get involved with the -- downtown to get involved with a system like that and certainly new construction we've proposed a lot of new commercial buildings that will be constructed in the transbay area and that may be a wonderful site to have something like that and it also makes for a more pleasant heat. steamed heat is quiet and general and not forced air. they've gotten better with the forced air but it's sort of an on and off system and you either get real cool or too hot. it's not as balanced as steam heat in my opinion. i have a couple other suggestions. i assume your green buildings are encouraging having enough stairways. some of the buildings built in the 60's, particularly french hospital, many of the buildings don't have stairways and you have to either take the elevator or walk two or three buildings away to take the stairway and they felt no need for stairways in those days because nobody was going to walk up and down them. the other thing i wanted to a
. >> commissioner antonini: that sounds great and hopefully we can persuade some of the existing buildings in parts of doubt to get involved with the -- downtown to get involved with a system like that and certainly new construction we've proposed a lot of new commercial buildings that will be constructed in the transbay area and that may be a wonderful site to have something like that and it also makes for a more pleasant heat. steamed heat is quiet and general and not forced air....
SFGTV2: San Francisco Government Television
51
51
Jan 17, 2013
01/13
by
SFGTV2
tv
eye 51
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> commissioner antonini: i know we were talking about that but i was talking about changes now as we talk about where the boring of the street changes are going to come out. we don't need another eir for that obviously but i mean i don't know how much more planning would be involved, whenever the option is decided upon how to terminate the central subway in the northern end. >> you're going to see that in a couple of weeks there is an option put forward and will come to you because it requires a planning code amendment. >> commissioner antonini: i'm sure this is all being taken into consideration, piers 30 and 32, we've budgeted for theablese analysis necessary. >> that was covered in this year's budget. >> commissioner antonini: thank you. >> president fong: commissioner moore. >> commissioner moore: excuse me, i hear you say, besides i think you're making a great pretion, it seems you're really understanding how this all comes together. you made more money than you spent is that correct? >> we're projecting we will take in more money than originally anticipated. >> commissioner
. >> commissioner antonini: i know we were talking about that but i was talking about changes now as we talk about where the boring of the street changes are going to come out. we don't need another eir for that obviously but i mean i don't know how much more planning would be involved, whenever the option is decided upon how to terminate the central subway in the northern end. >> you're going to see that in a couple of weeks there is an option put forward and will come to you...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
100
100
Jan 6, 2013
01/13
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 100
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> commissioner antonini? >> excuse me, commissioner wu i wanted to clarify that the zone the rm-1 zoning would not allow any additional units on this property. it's at its max mulch maximum right now. >> commissioner antonini. >> to be necessary and desire, you don't have to necessarily add another unit. i have seen additions to single-family homes and multi-dwelling units that make it nice to live. i would like to make a motion to approve with the following conditions, dropping the floor to floor height to 13' and take a 1.5 foot off of there and go with flat solar panels. i think the total floor to floor was 14.5, am i not wrong on that? >> i would just like an interpretation of this section. >> excuse me, that is okay. but the motion would be to take a foot and a half off and make flat solar panels and you have a nice, high interior space. >> commissioner sugaya, you are looking at interior height, 13. >> section you have floor to floor heights, as well as the floor dimensions. and it goes 8.1 8.1, 10 and
. >> commissioner antonini? >> excuse me, commissioner wu i wanted to clarify that the zone the rm-1 zoning would not allow any additional units on this property. it's at its max mulch maximum right now. >> commissioner antonini. >> to be necessary and desire, you don't have to necessarily add another unit. i have seen additions to single-family homes and multi-dwelling units that make it nice to live. i would like to make a motion to approve with the following...
SFGTV2: San Francisco Government Television
70
70
Jan 25, 2013
01/13
by
SFGTV2
tv
eye 70
favorite 0
quote 0
commissioner antonini, borden, moore, that motion passes unanimously, 6-0. places you under public comment. i have no speaker cards. >> happy new year to everyone. today is my first day back at city hall. i didn't see the agenda. i'm on way to human rights commission. let me state the purpose i'm here for. because of our pass supervisor, kristina, she last month or so, she request a public hearing be on planning commission, o.e.w.d. and the oversight committee as it relate, fillmore, a 2 area. i'm here stating purpose that aisle looking forward for this public hearing come up. we have a new supervisor, you call her queen b., which is london b. from the community. i look forward to coming to this commission. you guys got three minutes too, that's good. hoping we can work out some things. this request basically going back to history of redevelopment agency and seeing what they call urban renewal the effects happening in our community. ladies and gentlemen, the story is drastic. i'm speaking as an african-american here i am now 2013, after all of these years at
commissioner antonini, borden, moore, that motion passes unanimously, 6-0. places you under public comment. i have no speaker cards. >> happy new year to everyone. today is my first day back at city hall. i didn't see the agenda. i'm on way to human rights commission. let me state the purpose i'm here for. because of our pass supervisor, kristina, she last month or so, she request a public hearing be on planning commission, o.e.w.d. and the oversight committee as it relate, fillmore, a 2...
SFGTV2: San Francisco Government Television
75
75
Jan 11, 2013
01/13
by
SFGTV2
tv
eye 75
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> commissioner antonini. >> well, i certainly am sympathetic to the neighbors and their arguments. there seems to be a lot of conformity to the heights. however, i think looking at one of the pictures there is a building on the same side of the street that has a third floor already present and it doesn't seem to be too intuitive looking, at least from the view that was shown. they did as good a job as you can claiming it's five and a half to seven and a half feet taller than the others, and if that is correct then that's fairly well done, and they have -- >> (inaudible). >> i'm speaking. thank you. you know they kept the pitch roof which is very important and i am assume that is what we will see mr. kelvin as we look from a distance as your pictures show a pitch on the top of the roof, so it has a gaibl to it. it's not a flat roof. is that correct? >> andy can speak in more detail. it's absolutely flat roof until you get there. >> both are recommended by the guidelines to reduce the massing as much as possible. >> there was the one view shown from a distance away that does -- the o
. >> commissioner antonini. >> well, i certainly am sympathetic to the neighbors and their arguments. there seems to be a lot of conformity to the heights. however, i think looking at one of the pictures there is a building on the same side of the street that has a third floor already present and it doesn't seem to be too intuitive looking, at least from the view that was shown. they did as good a job as you can claiming it's five and a half to seven and a half feet taller than the...
SFGTV2: San Francisco Government Television
77
77
Jan 11, 2013
01/13
by
SFGTV2
tv
eye 77
favorite 0
quote 0
commissioner antonini. >> the reason it was point the out was the type of zoning there and there are no tall buildings. however this is the top of the hill and make it a desirable site and you have geographical limits if it's up the a higher installation and i move. >> second. >> on that motion. >> commissioner. >> aye. >> commissioner. >> aye. >> commissioner president fong. >> aye. >> so moved commissioners. that passes unanimously four to zero. that places you on item 13 at 1515 sloat boulevard. >> good afternoon president fong and commissioners want i amric crawford from department staff and this is to legalize a retail restaurant sushi avenue located in the luckies shopping center within lake shore plaza sud districts. the 120 square foot stand is located near the northern door of the store and replaces a starbucks. they began operations prior to filing the application for conditional use. the project sponsor was unaware of the requirement that they needed it when replacing another for another classification. they did not intent to circumvent the process and a stand alone buildi
commissioner antonini. >> the reason it was point the out was the type of zoning there and there are no tall buildings. however this is the top of the hill and make it a desirable site and you have geographical limits if it's up the a higher installation and i move. >> second. >> on that motion. >> commissioner. >> aye. >> commissioner. >> aye. >> commissioner president fong. >> aye. >> so moved commissioners. that passes unanimously...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
70
70
Jan 5, 2013
01/13
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 70
favorite 0
quote 0
commissioner antonini, i would move to adopt? >> second. >> commissioner antonini? >> yes, as you know, there is a statewide requirement to provide housing for all income levels and in particular county or cities. but it does not necessarily have to be inclusionary housing. i mean, you can use other methods of doing it. from what i understand, and maybe you could comment on other jurisdictions within the bay area? what do they do? if they use inclusionary, what sort of percentages of ami are they using for their rental and housing or ownership units? are they similar to ours? are they lower percentages? well, there is an ami level and there is also the 15% on-site and 20% offsite? >> i'm afraid i can't comment on that. i am not familiar with inclusionary programs in other jurisdictions. >> that is a problem for me, because when i am asked to vote on this, i have to know what other places are doing and i think you are doing a good job, but i don't think i can support it at that point, because i really don't have all the information. if it comes up in the future, i wo
commissioner antonini, i would move to adopt? >> second. >> commissioner antonini? >> yes, as you know, there is a statewide requirement to provide housing for all income levels and in particular county or cities. but it does not necessarily have to be inclusionary housing. i mean, you can use other methods of doing it. from what i understand, and maybe you could comment on other jurisdictions within the bay area? what do they do? if they use inclusionary, what sort of...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
124
124
Jan 12, 2013
01/13
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 124
favorite 0
quote 0
commissioner antonini. >> i am trying to visualize this. one thing that is extraordinary we have a deep lot. it is 138 feet deep so that tends to mitigate the amount of addition. mr. crawford if i am correct i am reading they plan to go out on the ground floor 24 feet -- oh i'm sorry you're handling this. i didn't realize. 24 feet on the ground floor, and then 18 feet on the second and third floor i guess. >> yeah. 24 feet on the ground floor. the second floor extends as deep as the ground floor. >> yeah, and the third floor is the 18-foot. >> correct. >> then i was looking around to see what the depth of the present building is because they still have a lot of rear yard left it would seem. got 138 feet total and after the addition obviously they're compliant because this is a code compliant project. >> yeah. it looks as though i am just doing a quick adding up here. it seems that the existing rear yard is approximately 55 feet deep. >> okay. so they're taking -- at the most off of there they're taking 24 feet off of one floor -- or two flo
commissioner antonini. >> i am trying to visualize this. one thing that is extraordinary we have a deep lot. it is 138 feet deep so that tends to mitigate the amount of addition. mr. crawford if i am correct i am reading they plan to go out on the ground floor 24 feet -- oh i'm sorry you're handling this. i didn't realize. 24 feet on the ground floor, and then 18 feet on the second and third floor i guess. >> yeah. 24 feet on the ground floor. the second floor extends as deep as the...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
41
41
Jan 19, 2013
01/13
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 41
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> president fong: commissioner antonini. >> commissioner antonini: just as a clarification, originally when we talked about firemen's fund ucsf you said a sale but i'm hearing it may be a redevelopment of the area with a different built environment. is that what -- >> director rahaim: yeah. i believe as a state agency, they're not allowed to -- state university, they can't sell outright because that would be lease but the idea is it would be redeveloped and ucsf would move out. >> commissioner antonini: but there could be a difficult built environment but you're not sure what they have in mind. >> director rahaim: the assumption there would be a whole new different buildings there, new development, yes angetd thank you. >> president fong: commissioner sugaya. >> commissioner sugaya: just on sue hestor's point about an org chart there is one but it doesn't have staff so you can put people on here. >> director rahaim: we have a work chart that shows the staff names and we've happy to put that on the website. >> commissioner sugaya: that would help because i've wondered where people are a
. >> president fong: commissioner antonini. >> commissioner antonini: just as a clarification, originally when we talked about firemen's fund ucsf you said a sale but i'm hearing it may be a redevelopment of the area with a different built environment. is that what -- >> director rahaim: yeah. i believe as a state agency, they're not allowed to -- state university, they can't sell outright because that would be lease but the idea is it would be redeveloped and ucsf would move...